Community Banks Sue OCC, Call Crypto Charters a "Side Door" Nobody Asked For 🚪
The Independent Community Bankers of America filed suit Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, accusing the regulator of exceeding the legal limits Congress set when it grants national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency companies. The trade group, which represents community banks, argues that the OCC has turned the national trust charter into "a side door into the banking system for crypto firms" by allowing companies to obtain charters for substantial non-fiduciary activities without the obligations that apply to insured depository institutions.
ICBA President and CEO Rebeca Romero Rainey said the OCC's decision to permit such charters "exceeds the authority Congress granted the agency," and that crypto firms gain the credibility of a federal bank charter without Community Reinvestment Act obligations, consolidated supervision, capital and liquidity standards, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. insurance. The complaint, brought under the Administrative Procedure Act, targets the OCC's March 2, 2026 final rule tied to Interpretive Letter No. 1176 and asks the court to declare both unlawful. It also specifically seeks to vacate the conditional charter of Protego Holdings, citing what the group described as governance and risk-control shortcomings.
The lawsuit escalates a fight that has been building as digital-asset companies flock to the OCC. The agency has cleared or drawn applications from a wave of firms including Circle, Ripple, Paxos, Fidelity, BitGo, Kraken's parent Payward, Jack Dorsey's Block, and World Liberty Financial. OpenReserve Bank, backed by Andreessen Horowitz among other venture capital heavyweights, received preliminary conditional approval from the OCC on September 2 to charter a full-service national bank in Salt Lake City, Utah, closing a review of just under five months after OpenReserve filed its application on April 13.
The ICBA has framed the dispute as one of competitive fairness, saying community banks face a "severe competitive disadvantage" while crypto firms operate under lighter oversight. Trust bank charters do not allow companies to accept deposits or make loans, distinguishing them from conventional commercial banks. The suit also warns of a consumer-protection gap, arguing that digital assets held at a crypto firm operating under a trust charter do not carry the federal protections customers expect from a chartered bank, and that the charter preempts many state consumer-protection laws while regulating these entities more lightly than traditional banks.
The OCC, asked for comment, declined, with a spokesperson telling reporters the agency "does not comment on litigation." The lawsuit arrives as the OCC works to finalize GENIUS Act stablecoin rules by November, adding another front to the broader clash over how deeply crypto should be woven into the federal banking system.
Join the conversation on X
Reply, repost or quote our post on this story.
Share Article
Quick Info
Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.
See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.