Beijing Slaps Export Ban on 10 US Defense Firms, Rare Earths in the Crosshairs 🪨
Back to feed

Beijing Slaps Export Ban on 10 US Defense Firms, Rare Earths in the Crosshairs 🪨

—By our Regulation & Policy Desk2 min read

China's commerce ministry said on June 22 it will halt dual-use exports to 10 American defense and rare earth companies, retaliating against the Pentagon's recent expansion of its watch list of Chinese firms with alleged military ties. The ministry also barred companies and individuals in third countries from transferring Chinese-origin dual-use goods to any of the 10 firms, and said Chinese exporters may apply for a waiver only for goods deemed "genuinely necessary."

The banned firms span drones, aerospace, ground vehicles, maritime systems, and critical minerals. Drone and unmanned-systems suppliers make up the bulk of the list: AVEOX, Red Cat Holdings, Teal Drones, IMSAR, and Jaia Robotics. Ball Aerospace, Oshkosh Defense, and L3Harris Maritime Services cover aerospace, armored vehicles, and naval services, respectively. Two rare earth companies also made Beijing's list: MP Materials, which operates the only active rare earth mine and processing facility in the United States, and USA Rare Earth, which is building a domestic magnet supply chain across Colorado, Texas, and Oklahoma.

Beijing framed the ban as a direct response to what it called Washington's "wrongful expansion" of the so-called 1260H list. That Pentagon designation, updated earlier this month, added electric-vehicle maker BYD, e-commerce giant Alibaba, search and mapping company Baidu, and automaker NIO, among others. The designation bars the Pentagon from awarding direct contracts to listed companies starting June 30.

The sanctions came a month after President Donald Trump visited Beijing for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping aimed at stabilizing relations between the world's two largest economies. Both sides agreed to work toward reducing tariffs, but tensions have since resurfaced over technology and defense. George Chen, partner for Greater China at The Asia Group, said the response was unsurprising and proportionate, and that whether Beijing keeps its response calibrated or widens it depends on how Washington responds before the June 30 deadline.

Share:
Publishercryptonewsroom.xyz
Published—
CategoryRegulation

Disclaimer: This content is for information and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions.

See our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Editorial Policy.